National Alliance of Lebanese Americans
NALA
11/4/2005
The National Alliance of Lebanese Americans issued the following press release:
In its statement released Wednesday, November 2, 2005, the Maronite Bishops
of Lebanon issued a statement in support of Lebanese President Emile Lahoud
remaining in office until the completion of the extended mandate voted upon by
the Lebanese parliament in August 2004.
As reported in Reuters, the Bishops wrote, "The current dispute over whether
the president should remain or vacate his position has got Lebanon into an
awkward situation. The presidency should be above this dispute." The
Bishops' statement also declared, "This dispute is paralyzing political activity in
Lebanon and distracting officials from taking an interest in deteriorating
daily affairs of citizens and harms the economic situation." Finally the
report quotes the Bishops as declaring that the constitution should have the last
word in resolving the issue of Lahoud's mandate.
The position of the Bishops reflects the position of the Maronite clergy
generally that the Lebanese presidency, as the reserve of the Maronites under
the confessional system of apportionment of elective offices, is the "voice"
of
the Christians in the counsels of government in Lebanon with Fouad Siniora,
the Sunni Prime Minister and Nabih Berri the Shiite Speaker of Parliament.
Fearful of the precedent that may be set of involuntarily removing the
president from office and therefore adversely affecting the prestige and function
of
the Christian presidency, the clergy have taken this position that any
action taken with regard to Lahoud mandate be accomplished strictly within the
bounds of the constitution.
The National Alliance of Lebanese Americans (NALA) shares the concerns of
the Maronite Bishops with regard to the paralysis that exists in the Lebanese
government and the isolation in which the Lahoud presidency has been placed by
events. NALA is also committed to the principle of constitutional
government and to the concept that any situation which arises in the national life
of
the country must have a constitutional solution, or it has no solution at
all. The rule of law demands that every action undertaken by the government
created and established by the constitution have a grounds and a basis for action
found within the four corners of the constitution.
The reality of the Lahoud Extension, unfortunately does not reflect such a
commitment to constitutional government in Lebanon. Rather, the Lebanese
Constitution provided that the Lahoud presidential mandate should expire,
constitutionally, in October 2004. That a three year extension was voted upon
and
approved by the Lebanese Parliament was a function of several actions which
occurred outside of the four corners of the constitution.
First, the Lebanese Constitution was amended by Parliament under instruction
and duress exerted against the Deputies by the Syrian intelligence services
headquartered at Anjar, Lebanon. The results of the UN Commission on the
Assassination of former Prime Minister Rafic Hariri makes clear that pressure
was exerted from the highest levels of the Syrian government against officials
of the Lebanese government to force the amendment of the constitution so as
to allow for an extension of the presidential mandate. The amendment, which
was adopted by Parliament, was the product of coercion, undue influence,
threats and intimidation carried out by the occupying Syrian force against
members
of the Lebanese Parliament.
Second, the vote in Parliament to avail itself of the coerced amendment to
the constitution and thereby allow Mr. Lahoud to be extended in office, was
equally the product of the same coercion exercised by the same illicit source in
violation not only of the will of the Lebanese people, but in derogation of
the sovereignty of the Lebanese Republic.
The fact that Lahoud remains in office is a residual manifestation of the
occupation policies of coercion, duress and undue influence exercised by the
former occupying power, Syria, against the will of the Lebanese people and in
derogation of Lebanese sovereignty. The will of the people was clearly shown
in March of 2005 when the people voted with their feet in demanding the end
of the Syrian occupation and the hegemony that it exercised against the will
of the Lebanese people in the public affairs of the country.
NALA calls upon the Lebanese Parliament to abrogate this remaining vestige
of the former occupation; restore integrity to the Lebanese Constitution; and
repeal the amendment which was adopted while the country was under
occupation. International law does not sanction the occupying force taking such
action
with regard to an occupied state. With the abrogation of this amendment,
the extended term of Mr. Lahoud would immediately cease as such term is not
sanctioned by the Constitution as it existed prior to its coerced amendment.
NALA calls upon the Maronite Bishops to take the broader view and to assume
their role, along with the Maronite Patriarch, of representing the unity of
Lebanon in all of her confessional communities. The Bishops are quite correct
that with an isolated President, the government is paralyzed at a time when
action is demanded on all fronts. Just today, there has been an exchange of
artillery and mortar fire along the southern border in the Shebaa District.
In addition there is the fiscal crisis of the country that is demanding
attention, the electricity shortages, the need to end the other vestige of the
late occupation and that is to end the systemic organized corruption that exists
within the Lebanese government, and the need to pass and adopt a new
electoral law.
The nation has pressing needs, the solutions to which will not only affect
the people in the near term but will set the course of the nation for years
and decades to come. NALA therefore calls upon Emile Lahoud to respond to the
needs of his fellow Maronites and fellow Lebanese more than he responds to
the interests of those who have installed him in the office of the presidency
beyond his constitutional term. For the good of the Lebanese Republic and
to restore the voice of the Christians to the councils of government, we call
upon Mr. Lahoud to perform the ultimate patriotic act and step down from
office, lead the effort to restore the Lebanese constitution and call the
Parliament into electoral session before the end of 2005 to elect the Twelfth
President of the Republic.